In this performance comparison, we pit the base model M4 Mac Mini against top-tier mini PCs from Intel and AMD to determine the best value for your money.

Unboxing and First Impressions

The Mac Mini stands out with its compact form factor and integrated power supply, while the other mini PCs offer various front-facing ports. All models provide ample rear-facing ports, but the Mac Mini lacks USB Type-A ports and an SD card reader.

Performance

In raw CPU power, the Intel and AMD mini PCs edge out the Mac Mini. However, in single-core performance, the M4 shines. For integrated GPU performance, the Mac Mini falls behind the AMD Radeon 890m, but it excels in metal benchmarks.

In real-world tests, the Mac Mini impresses in productivity and creative tasks. In video editing, it surpasses the competition thanks to its media engine. However, in 3D rendering, it trails behind.

Gaming is a weak spot for the Mac Mini due to limited game compatibility and issues with certain titles. While it matches or surpasses AMD’s Radeon 890m in some games, it suffers from poor visuals in others.

Other Factors

The M4 outperforms its rivals in energy efficiency, consuming less power than both the Intel and AMD processors.

The Mac Mini offers excellent price-to-performance, outperforming even custom-built PCs of similar cost.

Upgradability is limited on the Mac Mini, as storage and memory are not user-upgradeable. However, it has a solid selection of ports and can support up to three external displays.

Final Verdict

If you prioritize performance, value, and energy efficiency, the base model M4 Mac Mini is an exceptional choice. It excels in productivity, creativity, and casual gaming while offering an unbeatable price-to-performance ratio.

However, if you require more upgradability, prefer a wider game selection, or have specific operating system preferences, consider the other mini PCs in this comparison.